The 2019–2020 Supreme Court term delivered several landmark decisions that have significant implications for mental health and therapy practices, particularly in the realm of online therapy services provided to schools. This blog will explore key rulings and how practitioners can leverage these insights to improve their services.
Key Supreme Court Decisions and Their Implications
Insanity Defense and Mental Health
The Supreme Court’s decision in Kahler v. Kansas redefined the boundaries of the insanity defense. The ruling emphasized that states have the latitude to adopt different standards for the insanity defense, specifically whether to include the "moral capacity" test. This decision underscores the importance of understanding state-specific legal standards when working with clients involved in the criminal justice system.
Practical Applications:
- Tailored Assessments: Practitioners should customize their assessments to align with the specific legal standards of their state.
- Collaborative Approach: Work closely with legal professionals to ensure that your evaluations meet the necessary legal criteria.
- Continued Education: Stay updated on legal changes and rulings to provide the most relevant and effective therapy services.
Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation
In Bostock v. Clayton County, the Court ruled that discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity is prohibited under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. This landmark decision has broad implications for workplace policies and the support services provided to LGBTQ+ individuals.
Practical Applications:
- Inclusive Policies: Ensure that your practice’s policies are inclusive and non-discriminatory.
- Supportive Environment: Create a welcoming environment for LGBTQ+ clients, recognizing the unique challenges they may face.
- Training and Education: Invest in ongoing training for staff on issues related to sexual orientation and gender identity.
DACA and Reliance Interests
The decision in Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of Cal. highlighted the importance of considering the reliance interests of individuals affected by policy changes. For practitioners, this underscores the need to be aware of the broader socio-political context in which clients live and work.
Practical Applications:
- Holistic Approach: Incorporate an understanding of clients’ socio-political contexts into your therapy practices.
- Advocacy: Advocate for policies that consider the reliance interests of vulnerable populations, including DACA recipients.
- Resource Provision: Provide clients with resources and support to navigate changes in policy that may affect their lives.
Encouraging Further Research
These Supreme Court decisions provide a wealth of information that can be leveraged to improve therapy practices. Practitioners are encouraged to delve deeper into these rulings and consider their broader implications. Engaging in continuous research and staying informed about legal developments can significantly enhance the quality of care provided to clients.To read the original research paper, please follow this link:
Supreme Court 2019–2020: Insanity, Discrimination, and DACA—And a Pandemic 
