Introduction
In the ever-evolving field of international volunteer health work, practitioners are constantly seeking ways to enhance their skills and create meaningful impacts. The research article "Client or Volunteer? Understanding Neoliberalism and Neocolonialism Within International Volunteer Health Work" provides critical insights into the social dynamics and organizational structures that shape these experiences. By examining the pervasive influence of neoliberalism and neocolonialism, this study offers valuable lessons for practitioners aiming to improve their approach to international volunteer health work.
Understanding the Research
The study conducted by St-Amant, Ward-Griffin, Berman, and Vainio-Mattila (2018) employs an ethnographic approach to explore the social organizations within Canadian NGOs providing health work in Tanzania. Through text analysis, participant observation, and in-depth interviews, the researchers uncover the social relations that coordinate the volunteer experience. The findings reveal that neoliberalism and neocolonialism are deeply embedded in international volunteer health work, often resulting in an asymmetrical relationship where volunteers become "clients" over the local community.
Key Findings and Implications
The research identifies three key organizational social relations: "volunteer as client," "experience as commodity," and "free market evaluation." These relations highlight the commodification of the volunteer experience, where the needs of volunteers are prioritized over the needs of the local community. This dynamic reinforces power imbalances and perpetuates colonial legacies, ultimately hindering the potential for sustainable change.
- Volunteer as Client: The study reveals how volunteers often perceive themselves as clients, expecting recognition and value for their contributions. This mindset can lead to a sense of entitlement and privilege, undermining the collaborative efforts needed for effective health work.
- Experience as Commodity: The commodification of the volunteer experience is evident in the marketing strategies of NGOs. The promise of a "life-changing" experience can overshadow the genuine value of the work being done, reducing local communities to mere backdrops for personal growth.
- Free Market Evaluation: The reliance on market forces to evaluate the success of volunteer health work poses significant challenges. Without proper evaluation mechanisms, the potential for harm and exploitation in vulnerable communities remains high.
Improving Practice Through Awareness
For practitioners in the field of international volunteer health work, this research serves as a crucial reminder of the need for critical reflection and awareness. By understanding the social dynamics at play, practitioners can work towards more equitable and sustainable approaches. Here are some strategies to consider:
- Engage in Critical Reflection: Reflect on your motivations and expectations as a volunteer. Consider how your actions may reinforce power imbalances and colonial legacies.
- Prioritize Local Expertise: Collaborate with local practitioners and communities to ensure that their needs and knowledge are at the forefront of your efforts.
- Advocate for Systemic Change: Work towards creating organizational structures that prioritize community empowerment and sustainable development over individual experiences.
Encouraging Further Research
While this study provides valuable insights, there is a need for further research to explore the perspectives of local communities and the long-term impacts of international volunteer health work. By expanding our understanding of these dynamics, we can work towards more effective and ethical approaches in the field.
To read the original research paper, please follow this link: Client or Volunteer? Understanding Neoliberalism and Neocolonialism Within International Volunteer Health Work.
