Schools continue to respond to the long-term impact of disrupted learning, with a particular urgency to support pupils who have been disproportionately affected by disadvantage. High-quality tutoring—delivered as an addition to classroom teaching—can be a powerful lever for accelerating progress when it is planned carefully, staffed well, and implemented with strong routines for attendance, communication, and ongoing monitoring.
At TinyEYE, we work alongside schools to deliver online therapy services that fit within real school constraints: busy timetables, diverse learner needs (including SEND and EAL), safeguarding requirements, and the practical realities of staffing and space. While therapy and tutoring are not the same intervention, the implementation lessons from large-scale tutoring evidence are highly relevant to any structured, targeted support delivered to pupils. This post translates key themes from evidence gathered through evaluations of the National Tutoring Programme into practical considerations school leaders and teachers can use immediately.
Theme 1: Planning tutoring with clarity, time, and accountability
Effective tutoring rarely happens “on the side.” It benefits from deliberate planning and a clear strategic purpose. Before launching or expanding tutoring, school leaders can strengthen impact by defining what tutoring is meant to achieve and how it will be managed day to day.
Schedule planning time up front. Build in time to identify high-quality tutors, clarify roles, and ensure the programme complements classroom teaching rather than competing with it.
Allocate ongoing management time. Someone needs responsibility for oversight: relationships with tutors or providers, troubleshooting, safeguarding checks, and ensuring the programme stays aligned to school priorities.
Set a strategic aim. Decide whether the primary goal is closing gaps for disadvantaged pupils, boosting confidence, improving attendance and engagement, or accelerating progress in a specific subject area.
Plan funding intentionally. Consider how tutoring will be sustained, including whether pupil premium funding will support delivery and how you will evaluate value for money.
Monitor attendance, quality, and impact. Attendance is not a minor metric—it is closely tied to outcomes. Plan how you will track attendance, session quality, and pupil progress over time.
Engage parents early. Families can support routines, attendance, and follow-through—especially when sessions occur outside typical school hours or include tasks to complete at home.
Theme 2: Selecting pupils and tutors with “fit” in mind
Two selection decisions shape outcomes: which pupils receive tutoring and which adults deliver it. Both decisions should be grounded in data and professional judgment, while also accounting for motivation, confidence, and readiness to engage.
Selecting pupils
When selecting pupils, consider both need and likelihood of engagement. Ask:
Which pupils experienced the greatest learning disruption, and what evidence do we have (assessment data, teacher observation, attendance patterns, work samples)?
Which pupils are likely to engage consistently, and what barriers might reduce engagement for others (anxiety, fatigue, competing responsibilities, transport, stigma)?
Are there groups we want to prioritise (disadvantaged pupils, pupils with SEND, pupils with EAL), and what additional supports are needed to make tutoring accessible?
What alternative support is available for pupils for whom tutoring is not currently a good match?
Selecting tutors
The evidence highlights the importance of matching tutor skills to pupil needs. Depending on your context, you may look for:
Strong curriculum knowledge and the ability to align instruction with what pupils are learning in class.
Experience with SEND and neurodiversity, especially when pupils need explicit scaffolding, structured routines, or adapted materials.
Experience with EAL learners, including strategies that support vocabulary, comprehension, and confidence with academic language.
Proven rapport-building skills, because relationship and engagement strongly influence attendance and persistence.
In the tutoring evaluations referenced, different tutor qualifications appeared to matter in different contexts (for example, specialist qualifications benefiting older pupils in some cases). The practical takeaway for schools is to define what “good” looks like for your pupils, then recruit or partner accordingly.
Theme 3: Choosing the right group size for learning and logistics
Group size should be chosen based on pupil needs, the degree of personalisation required, and the learning goals.
One-to-one tutoring can be highly tailored and is often a strong fit for pupils with SEND, pupils with EAL, and pupils who are easily distracted. The trade-off is cost and capacity.
Small group tutoring can build a positive group dynamic and may increase engagement, particularly when pupils are grouped by similar need or attainment. The trade-off is reduced flexibility for individual attention.
Evidence from early NTP years indicated small group tutoring was common (often groups of three or four). In some primary contexts, small group English tutoring was associated with stronger outcomes than one-to-one, while maths outcomes were similar across one-to-one and small group formats. For school leaders, this suggests a balanced approach: use small groups where pupils can progress together, and reserve one-to-one for cases where personalisation is essential.
Theme 4: Deciding between face-to-face and online tutoring
Delivery mode is not just a preference—it affects scheduling, staffing, monitoring, and access. Many schools report that face-to-face tutoring can feel more engaging, especially for younger pupils, because adults can read non-verbal cues and use tactile resources. It can also be easier to monitor quality when tutoring happens on-site.
Online tutoring, however, offers meaningful advantages that are especially relevant when schools are balancing space constraints, staffing shortages, or pupil attendance challenges.
Flexibility to schedule outside the school day (evenings/weekends) when appropriate and agreed.
Access for pupils who are at home or unable to attend in person.
Efficiency with less need for physical space.
Digital tools that can support real-time feedback and documentation.
Online delivery does require readiness checks. Schools can reduce friction by ensuring devices, cameras, microphones, and headsets are available; confirming broadband reliability; and identifying a quiet, interruption-minimised space for pupils participating on-site. For any online work with pupils—tutoring or therapy—safeguarding procedures must be explicit, consistently followed, and regularly reviewed.
Theme 5: Scheduling sessions to protect learning time and maximise attendance
Scheduling is often where good intentions succeed or fail. Evidence-informed practice points to a simple principle: consistency matters.
Avoid repeated clashes with the same lessons. If sessions must occur during the school day, consider a rotating timetable so pupils do not consistently miss the same subject (or the same “favourite” subject, which can undermine motivation).
Think “regular and short.” At least weekly sessions, often around an hour, can maintain momentum. For younger pupils, shorter sessions (for example, around 30 minutes) may be more developmentally appropriate.
Plan for sufficient dosage. Many schools use a model of approximately 15 hours across an academic year, and evidence suggests that more hours attended is generally associated with better outcomes.
Because attendance is closely linked to outcomes, build attendance supports into the design rather than treating missed sessions as an unavoidable inconvenience.
Frame tutoring as a positive opportunity, not a punishment or a label.
Use reminders (texts/emails) to pupils, parents, and staff.
Arrange practical support during the school day (for example, collecting pupils and escorting them to sessions).
Consider light-touch incentives that fit your school culture.
Ask tutors to keep a live register so absence patterns are visible quickly.
Theme 6: Strengthening information sharing and communication with tutors
Tutoring is more effective when it is connected to what teachers know about the pupil and what the pupil is learning in class. Communication should be structured, not incidental.
Before sessions begin, share relevant information about strengths, needs, and priority targets.
Share curriculum context so tutoring can reinforce and extend classroom learning.
Establish a feedback routine so tutors provide regular updates on progress, barriers, and next steps.
Parent communication also matters. Schools that proactively engaged parents about the purpose and value of tutoring reported stronger attendance, including when sessions occurred outside normal hours.
Theme 7: Ensuring tutoring meets pupils’ needs through tailoring and alignment
The most consistent message across effective intervention work—tutoring, therapy, or targeted academic support—is that “fit” drives impact. Pupils benefit when sessions are responsive to their learning profile and when the experience builds confidence.
Tailor instruction. Use assessment and teacher insight to focus on the specific gaps that are holding the pupil back.
Attend to group dynamics. In small groups, ensure pupils are close enough in need that teaching can still be targeted.
Align where it matters. In maths, alignment with classroom methods can prevent confusion (for example, using the same approach to long division). In English, foundational skills like comprehension, vocabulary, and reading confidence may be supported even when content is less tightly matched to classroom texts.
Build confidence intentionally. Pupils often describe tutoring as a more relaxed environment where they feel safer to take risks, ask questions, and practise.
For school leaders, the implementation question becomes: how will we know tutoring is meeting pupils’ needs? A practical answer is to combine attendance data, brief progress measures, teacher feedback, and pupil voice. When those indicators are reviewed regularly, schools can adjust groupings, scheduling, and instructional focus before small issues become programme-wide barriers.
For more information, please follow this link.
