Key Findings and Implications
The study identified 2073 papers, with 710 focusing on health issues inside Syria, and 350 being conflict-related. Damascus and Aleppo were the most frequently studied areas. The research predominantly used quantitative methods, with health status, health systems, and humanitarian assistance being the most examined themes.
Geographic and Thematic Gaps
Despite the growing volume of research, significant gaps remain, particularly in the north-east and south of Syria. Themes like governance, financing, and medical products are under-researched. Practitioners should consider these gaps when planning interventions and advocate for more comprehensive studies.
Challenges in Conducting Research
Researchers faced numerous challenges, including safety concerns, limited access, and disrupted health infrastructures. These issues often resulted in incomplete data and potential biases. Understanding these challenges can help practitioners critically evaluate existing research and apply findings appropriately.
Innovative Research Methods
The study highlighted the use of novel methodologies, such as social media for data collection and remote interviews. Practitioners can adopt these innovative approaches to gather data and implement interventions in challenging environments.
Practical Applications for Practitioners
Practitioners can use the findings from this study to:
- Identify and address research gaps in their areas of practice.
- Apply innovative research methods to overcome challenges in conflict zones.
- Advocate for more comprehensive and geographically diverse research.
- Critically evaluate existing research for potential biases and limitations.
By incorporating these strategies, practitioners can enhance their skills and improve outcomes for children affected by conflict.
To read the original research paper, please follow this link: Conflict-related health research in Syria, 2011–2019: a scoping review for The Lancet - AUB Commission on Syria.
