Apply Today

If you are looking for a rewarding career
in online therapy apply today!

APPLY NOW

Sign Up For a Demo Today

Does your school need
Online Therapy Services

SIGN UP

Enhancing Skills in Treating Autism: Insights from Alternative Therapies Research

Enhancing Skills in Treating Autism: Insights from Alternative Therapies Research

As professionals dedicated to supporting children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), it's imperative to continuously seek out and critically assess innovative and alternative therapies that could enhance our practice and the lives of those we serve. A notable study by Bryna Siegel, PhD, from the University of California, San Francisco, delves into two such therapies: Facilitated Communication (F/C) and Auditory Integration Training (AIT). This blog aims to unpack the findings from Siegel's research and explore how these insights can either be integrated into our practice or guide us towards further research.

Understanding the Therapies

Facilitated Communication and Auditory Integration Training were developed with the intention of improving communication skills in children with autism. F/C was designed for individuals who are nonverbal and have found limited success with other augmentative communication forms, while AIT targeted those with some expressive skills but faced auditory processing challenges that affected their language development.

Critical Analysis of Facilitated Communication

The study critically examines the effectiveness of F/C, revealing that despite its widespread promotion and use, empirical evidence supporting its efficacy is lacking. Initial enthusiasm for F/C was based on anecdotal success stories and the appealing notion that it could unlock the hidden communicative potential of nonverbal individuals. However, subsequent research, including controlled studies, failed to validate these claims, consistently showing that the facilitator, not the individual with autism, was the source of the communication.

Auditory Integration Training: A Review

AIT, developed to address auditory hypersensitivity and processing issues in children with ASD, has similarly been subjected to scrutiny. Despite theoretical underpinnings suggesting that modulating auditory input could lead to improvements in language and behavioral domains, rigorous research has not substantiated these claims. Clinical trials and reviews have shown mixed results, with no significant evidence supporting AIT's effectiveness over control conditions.

Implications for Practice

The findings from Siegel's study prompt us to approach alternative therapies with a critical and scientific mindset. While the desire to find effective interventions is understandable, it's crucial to base our practices on methods that have been empirically validated. Here are some recommendations for practitioners:

Conclusion

The journey towards effective treatment for ASD is ongoing and requires a commitment to scientific principles and compassionate care. While F/C and AIT offer insights into the challenges and complexities of developing interventions for communication disorders in autism, they also underscore the importance of evidence in guiding our practices. By adhering to a research-informed approach, we can better serve our clients and contribute to the advancement of the field.

To explore the original research and deepen your understanding of these therapies, please follow this link: Assessing 'Alternative' Therapies for Communication Disorders in Children with Autistic Spectrum Disorders: Facilitated Communication and Auditory Integration Training.

Apply Today

If you are looking for a rewarding career
in online therapy apply today!

APPLY NOW

Sign Up For a Demo Today

Does your school need
Online Therapy Services

SIGN UP

Apply Today

If you are looking for a rewarding career
in online therapy apply today!

APPLY NOW

Sign Up For a Demo Today

Does your school need
Online Therapy Services

SIGN UP