Key Findings
The review by Camarata, Miller, and Wallace (2020) provides an in-depth analysis of SI/SP-T. Here are the primary takeaways:- SI/SP-T includes interventions targeting tactile, proprioceptive, and vestibular systems using specific equipment and activities.
- While there is some evidence suggesting positive outcomes, the overall evidence base is emerging and limited.
- Current studies often lack rigorous controls and standardized methodologies, leading to inconsistent results.
Recommendations for Practitioners
To improve the efficacy of SI/SP-T in your practice, consider the following evidence-based recommendations:- Implement Systematic Protocols: Follow standardized, manualized protocols for SI/SP-T to ensure consistency and reliability in treatment delivery.
- Control for Confounding Factors: Be aware of potential confounding factors, such as incidental behavioral interventions, and control for these in your practice.
- Use Multisensory Integration Assessments: Incorporate multisensory integration assessments to measure the broader impact of SI/SP-T on sensory processing and integration.
- Engage in Further Research: Participate in or conduct large-scale, randomized controlled trials to contribute to the growing evidence base for SI/SP-T.
Encouraging Further Research
While SI/SP-T shows promise, more high-quality research is needed to validate its effectiveness. Practitioners are encouraged to engage in evidence-based practice by critically evaluating current research and contributing to future studies.To read the original research paper, please follow this link: Evaluating Sensory Integration/Sensory Processing Treatment: Issues and Analysis
